Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-26 Thread Václav Ovsík
I wrote about failing on Sid and working on Testing yesterday. That was misleading. The right information should be: * working with 32bit kernel (2.6.24-1-s390) * failing with 64bit kernel (2.6.24-1-s390x) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/boot$ diff config-2.6.24-1-s390 config-2.6.24-1-s390x 4c4 # Mon

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-25 Thread Václav Ovsík
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:01:45PM -0500, James Antill wrote: So it's basically two parts to that test case: 1) Makes sure you can't allocate more data than a Ustr can hold (Ie. just less than SIZE_MAX). 2. Bits using big_tst() ... this uses ftruncate() + mmap() to fake a Ustr that is

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-25 Thread James Antill
Václav Ovsík [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. Type show copying and show warranty for details. This GDB was configured as s390-linux-gnu... Using host libthread_db library

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-21 Thread Bastian Blank
Package: ustr Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ustr_1.0.3-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390 98 [...] PASS: tst_99_enomem PASS: otst_99_enomem /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-21 Thread Václav Ovsík
Hi, On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: ustr Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ustr_1.0.3-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by sbuild/s390 98 ... Thanks for report. Whole

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-21 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:09:54AM -0500, James Antill wrote: It looks like my ENOMEM checks are failing. IIRC s390 is 31 bit? and those are designed for 32 bit ... so no big surprise I guess :(. No, s390 have 32 bit pointer but only a 31 bit address space. Probably the best instant fix is

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-21 Thread James Antill
Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:09:54AM -0500, James Antill wrote: It looks like my ENOMEM checks are failing. IIRC s390 is 31 bit? and those are designed for 32 bit ... so no big surprise I guess :(. No, s390 have 32 bit pointer but only a 31 bit address

Bug#466839: ustr - FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 3: 18890 Segmentation fault ./$tst

2008-02-21 Thread James Antill
Václav Ovsík [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23:40PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: Package: ustr Version: 1.0.3-2 Severity: serious There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: Automatic build of ustr_1.0.3-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by