On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:40:07AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Please can you be more specific?
- versions you have tried
All official versions (there has been a regression at some point, but
unfortunately I can't say when it happened).
I have tried the version from unstable, but
Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
I have removed everything under ~/.local/share/gnash, and now I started
looking for anything containing 'gnash' in .
clone 467324 -1
reassign -1 gnash
retitile -1 gnash: debris from older versions make current ones break
# don't know if this should be serious, but since gnash was never part
# of a release, I guess important is ok
severity -1 important
thanks
Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:06:34PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
This is no excuse for not contemplating stability, but in my experience
with
first-time users, they get the worst impression from youtube not working
(and
the response from the browser being utterly confusing) than with browser
--- Robert Millan [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in
a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
I think
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
I think it is stable enough to be included in Lenny, but it is not
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:29:26AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Note that usually people think of gnash in terms of the „flash plugin
for firefox”, and since the gnash package doesn't actually offer that
functionality, in tasksel we should talk about mozilla-plugin-gnash or
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 01:46:13PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:50:37AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
Gnash maintainers: Do you think gnash overall stability is currently in a
good
state for lenny? If not, how viable is it to make it rock-solid by that
time?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:00:33PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
For the moment I'd prefer to keep it for some time in testing and see how it
works for everyone before adding it to the desktop task, even though it works
quite well now for me and for other people I've asked to try it, it needs
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
users won't really notice what they are running and might perceive
debian in general as being-broken if they visit a site that has
not-support flash content.
retitle 467564 gnash: debris from older versions make current ones break
# there seems to be a functional workaround, even if complex
severity 467564 normal
thanks
retitile -1 gnash: debris from older versions make current ones break
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
I
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
users won't really notice what they are running and might perceive
debian in general as
On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
difference yet. We are getting closer to that point, but that doesn't
mean that its wise to start the
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
total have enough market power (read: userbase) to make much of a
difference yet. We are getting closer
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 03:40:05PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
The negative thing about installing gnash by default is that normal
users won't really notice
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:17:42PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 05:48:47PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
On 26/02/2008, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, but face the truth: unfortunately, neither debian nor linux in
total have enough market power (read:
--- Eddy PetriÈor [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I am not sure if gnash shouldn't conflict with the non-free flash plugin.
That will probably make sense, as well as maybe conflicting with
swfdec-mozilla ... or maybe using alternatives for switching?
Miry
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 04:41:07PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
So for the time being, its looks far better to put the work into
something that provides users with a superior user experience; for
instance, superior by choice (like what the plugin finder improvement
would do); grow the user
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:10:56AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I use gnash regularly (in combination with adblock) and I think it's
reasonably
mature nowadays. At least, it works for the most common flash sites, like
youtube.
I disagree, lately, none of the official Debian packages worked
Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:10:56AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
I use gnash regularly (in combination with adblock) and I think it's
reasonably
mature nowadays. At least, it works for the most common flash sites, like
youtube.
I disagree, lately, none of the official
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.71
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'd like to propose gnash browser plugins being added to the desktop task.
A significant amount of websites nowadays use flash; significant enough
that most of our first-time users are troubled with the difficulty of finding
and
Robert Millan wrote:
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.71
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I'd like to propose gnash browser plugins being added to the desktop task.
A significant amount of websites nowadays use flash; significant enough
that most of our first-time users are troubled with the
22 matches
Mail list logo
