William Pitcock dijo [Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:41:25AM -0600]:
> Clearly these packages are different enough to somebody if they are
> going to the effort of packaging them. Perhaps they have a superior
> configuration format or some other non-notable feature.
>
> But if you are worried about the Q
William Pitcock dijo [Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 05:41:25AM -0600]:
> But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
> create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
> recruiting new DDs.
>
> Lets call it, say, 'community', 'extras', or 'unsupported'.
>
> The
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 10:33 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> But the user should not have to install 10 small HTTP servers just to
> know what's the goddamn difference. That's extremely unhelpful from
> us. We should tell the prospective user at a first glance why he wants
> one httpd over another.
William Pitcock dijo [Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:02:39PM -0600]:
> Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
> like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
> options for the same thing e.g. openssh, dropbear for sshd, 12 different
> httpd opti
I created an updated description. Please see below.
One thing i forgot to mention earlier was the feature of logging the http
requests
directly to a mysql-database.
I'm not quite sure, but I think this feature is not supported by most other
webservers.
Description: small http server
Monkey is
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, William Pitcock wrote:
But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
recruiting new DDs.
Lets call it, say, 'community', 'extras', or 'unsupported'.
Please don't!
Kind regards
On Fri, February 29, 2008 12:41, William Pitcock wrote:
> But if you are worried about the QA and security team, then why not
> create an unsupported repo. It could even be a good solution towards
> recruiting new DDs.
I have no intent of stopping you to create any third party repositories.
> Sur
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 11:16 +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Fri, February 29, 2008 03:02, William Pitcock wrote:
> > Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
> > like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
> > options for the same
On Fri, February 29, 2008 03:02, William Pitcock wrote:
> Why does a package need to clarify what's different about it than others
> like it? Debian is about having the possibility of choosing between many
> options for the same thing e.g. openssh, dropbear for sshd, 12 different
> httpd options, e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/08 20:02, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[snip]
>> Even there, it looks very much like other "very small" webservers,
>> such as boa, bozohttpd, cherokee, fnord, lighttpd, micro-httpd,
>> mini-ht
On Thu, 2008-02-28 at 18:47 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Guus Sliepen dijo [Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:55:08PM +0100]:
> > > Monkey is a Web Server written in C based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol. The
> > > objective is to develop a fast, efficient, small and easy to configure
> > > webserver.
> > > Althou
Guus Sliepen dijo [Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 07:55:08PM +0100]:
> > Monkey is a Web Server written in C based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol. The
> > objective is to develop a fast, efficient, small and easy to configure
> > webserver.
> > Although it is very small and does not need much system resources, it
Hi,
@Guus:
thanks for your hints. I can easily change that.
@Nico:
there is not much difference betweeen monkey and other webservers. There
are already lots of other webservers in the repositories like mini_httpd,
micro_httpd, dhttpd. Do they differ that much?
Debian is always full of pride rega
Hi Thorsten,
* Thorsten Schmale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-27 16:19]:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Thorsten Schmale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: monkey
> Version : 0.9.2
> Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:/
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 03:51:38PM +0100, Thorsten Schmale wrote:
> * Package name: monkey
> Description : monkey is a small webserver based on the HTTP/1.1 protocol
Don't include the name of the package in the short description. Also,
"HTTP/1.1 protocol" is more something for the long
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thorsten Schmale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: monkey
Version : 0.9.2
Upstream Author : Eduardo Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://monkeyd.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
16 matches
Mail list logo
