Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-22 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Tore Anderson a écrit : > * Marco d'Itri > >> Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue? >> >> The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more and more >> sites will deploy IPv6 and we must be sure to not make them less >> reliable for the people adopting transit

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-21 Thread Tore Anderson
* Marco d'Itri > Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue? > > The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more and more > sites will deploy IPv6 and we must be sure to not make them less > reliable for the people adopting transition mechanisms. Just adding som

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-17 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 17, Tore Anderson wrote: > It would be great if Debian could also apply the patch. That is clearly > the behaviour that will serve end users the best. Agreed. Can the libc maintainers please comment on this issue? The next Debian release will be used in a period in which more and more si

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-17 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi, another update here: Ubuntu has also applied the patch to their libc package, see , and it will as I understand it be part of their release that's due in a couple of weeks. It would be great if Debian could also apply the patch. That is clearly the behavio

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-06 Thread Tore Anderson
Just a little update here: Fedora has commited the change and it'll be part of F13. See . I have tested their patch (attached) and it works as expected. It would really be fantastic if this could be commited to Debian as well! Best regards, --

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2010-04-04 Thread Tore Anderson
Hi, The current practise of scoping RFC 3484-addresses as site-local is causing real operational problems on today's internet, and is inhibiting the rollout of IPv6 on the content side: Consider a setup where an end user has his computer on a LAN with RFC 1918-based private IPv4 addresses (using

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2008-03-05 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Remi Denis-Courmont a écrit : > Package: libc6 > Version: 2.7-9 > Severity: normal > Tags: patch > > > Hello, > > Rule 2 of the Destination Address Selection algorithm in RFC3484 > specifies: > > | Rule 2: Prefer matching scope. > | If Scope(DA) = Scope(Source(DA)) and Scope(DB) <> Scope

Bug#468801: libc6: RFC3484 scoping rules should only affect IPv6, not IPv4

2008-03-01 Thread Remi Denis-Courmont
Package: libc6 Version: 2.7-9 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hello, Rule 2 of the Destination Address Selection algorithm in RFC3484 specifies: | Rule 2: Prefer matching scope. | If Scope(DA) = Scope(Source(DA)) and Scope(DB) <> Scope(Source(DB)), | then prefer DA. Similarly, if Scope(D