Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-29 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 09:11:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > FYI, in addition to the 64-bit binaries needing removal from the archive, > linux86 has now also FTBFS on hppa: > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux86&arch=hppa&ver=0.16.17-2.1&stamp=1218530534&file=log&as=raw Several pack

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
FYI, in addition to the 64-bit binaries needing removal from the archive, linux86 has now also FTBFS on hppa: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux86&arch=hppa&ver=0.16.17-2.1&stamp=1218530534&file=log&as=raw -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Deb

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:36:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > clone 471404 -1 > retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs > severity -2 wishlist > thanks > > Robert Millan wrote: > > Package: bin86 > > Version: 0.16.17-2 > > Severity: grave > > > > The 64-bit versions of this package don't

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
clone 471404 -1 retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs severity -2 wishlist thanks Robert Millan wrote: > Package: bin86 > Version: 0.16.17-2 > Severity: grave > > The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full > of > sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-03-18 Thread Robert Millan
Package: bin86 Version: 0.16.17-2 Severity: grave The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full of sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to mess up alignment, etc. Attached patch fixes some of the problems, although I didn't get it to produce equivalent images