Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-29 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 09:11:02PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: FYI, in addition to the 64-bit binaries needing removal from the archive, linux86 has now also FTBFS on hppa: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux86arch=hppaver=0.16.17-2.1stamp=1218530534file=logas=raw Several packages

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-23 Thread Steve Langasek
FYI, in addition to the 64-bit binaries needing removal from the archive, linux86 has now also FTBFS on hppa: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=linux86arch=hppaver=0.16.17-2.1stamp=1218530534file=logas=raw -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-06 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
clone 471404 -1 retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs severity -2 wishlist thanks Robert Millan wrote: Package: bin86 Version: 0.16.17-2 Severity: grave The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full of sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to mess

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-08-06 Thread Robert Millan
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:36:05PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: clone 471404 -1 retitle -1 linux86: Port to 64 bit archs severity -2 wishlist thanks Robert Millan wrote: Package: bin86 Version: 0.16.17-2 Severity: grave The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful

Bug#471404: 64-bit versions not useful

2008-03-18 Thread Robert Millan
Package: bin86 Version: 0.16.17-2 Severity: grave The 64-bit versions of this package don't produce useful code; they're full of sizeof(long) == 4 assumptions, causing as86 to mess up alignment, etc. Attached patch fixes some of the problems, although I didn't get it to produce equivalent