Hilmar Preuße wrote:
> On 15.03.09 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote:
>> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>> > Is there any progress on obtaining
>> > /usr/share/common-licenses/LPPL-1.3 ?
>>
>> None at all AFAIK. Or have you submitted a bug, Hilmar?
>>
> http://bugs.debian.org/481491
Tha
On 15.03.09 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi!
> > Is there any progress on obtaining
> > /usr/share/common-licenses/LPPL-1.3 ?
>
> None at all AFAIK. Or have you submitted a bug, Hilmar?
>
http://bugs.debian.org/481491
However the policy maintainers weren't r
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:24:13 +0100 Frank Küster wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > Hi!
[...]
> > Is there any progress on obtaining a better phrasing
> > from docstrip-generated comments?
>
> This has been brought up on the TeXLive upstream mailing list, and IIRC
> it turned out that this is n
Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Is there any progress on obtaining
> /usr/share/common-licenses/LPPL-1.3 ?
None at all AFAIK. Or have you submitted a bug, Hilmar?
> Is there any progress on obtaining a better phrasing
> from docstrip-generated comments?
This has been brought up on the TeXLive
Hi!
Is there any progress on obtaining
/usr/share/common-licenses/LPPL-1.3 ?
Is there any progress on obtaining a better phrasing
from docstrip-generated comments?
Regards,
--
On some search engines, searching for my nickname AND
"nano-documents" may lead you to my website...
5 matches
Mail list logo