[Stephen Gran]
I was half waiting to see if upstream would release a new version,
but it looks like the recent flurry of activity is over. I'll see
about it this weekend.
Good. I hope it will make it in time for Lenny.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
[Stephen Gran]
Great, thanks - I didn't realize that was valid syntax. I left it
as 0 6 since they are harmless noops, but I agree it would be better
to be clear.
Any hope of having this fixed soon? I'm tracking the dependency based
boot sequencing release goal, and this is one of the few
This one time, at band camp, Petter Reinholdtsen said:
[Stephen Gran]
Great, thanks - I didn't realize that was valid syntax. I left it
as 0 6 since they are harmless noops, but I agree it would be better
to be clear.
Any hope of having this fixed soon? I'm tracking the dependency
Package: hdparm
Version: 8.6-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
while testing insserv, I found that hdparm uses a slighly incorrect LSB
init header.
It currently uses
update-rc.d hdparm start 07 S .
in postinst. A simple reason is, that the stop action is a simple no-op.
So the LSB header
This one time, at band camp, Michael Biebl said:
while testing insserv, I found that hdparm uses a slighly incorrect LSB
init header.
It currently uses
update-rc.d hdparm start 07 S .
in postinst. A simple reason is, that the stop action is a simple no-op.
So the LSB header should be
5 matches
Mail list logo
