Hi !
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Scott and Vincent,
>
> thank you for your feedback. At the moment i see two alternatives
> (three if a static library is not a taboo)
>
> I'm using CMAKE as build system because it is better supported by
> upstream. I can achieve
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Hi Scott and Vincent,
>
> thank you for your feedback. At the moment i see two alternatives
> (three if a static library is not a taboo)
Static is not taboo and can be included in -dev packages. Depending
maintainers, however, are strongl
On Thu, 17. Jan 16:44 Scott Howard wrote:
> If your library belongs to a package that doesn't believe in sane
> SONAME version numbering, but instead releases based on version
> numbers that have nothing to do with binary compatibility, it is
> sometimes best to use the -release LDFLAG:
Hi Scott
On Thu, 17. Jan 16:44 Scott Howard wrote:
> Hello, late to the party but wanted to put in a comment regarding
> library package naming/versioning. Please ignore this if it has
> already been discussed and i missed it in the thread)
Hi Scott,
you aren't late to the party, it never stops. :) I hav
Hello, late to the party but wanted to put in a comment regarding
library package naming/versioning. Please ignore this if it has
already been discussed and i missed it in the thread)
If your library belongs to a package that doesn't believe in sane
SONAME version numbering, but instead releases b
5 matches
Mail list logo
