brian m. carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:41:20AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Given the discussion so far at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/2792
I think it's silly to intentionally weaken part of the cryptosystem.
The weakest
tags 476441 upstream wontfix
thanks
Given the discussion so far at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/2792
I'm inclined to close this as a wontfix report.
You may want to review our documentation on key sizes:
clone 476441 -1 -2
reassign -1 mutt
retitle -1 mutt: should provide options for cipher selections
severity -1 wishlist
retitle -2 libgnutls26: use the same names for ciphers as OpenSSL
severity -2 normal
kthxbye
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:41:20AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Given the
Package: libgnutls26
Version: 2.2.2-1
Severity: important
When authenticating against a dovecot IMAP server, mutt now uses AES128,
not AES256. There is no reason that mutt should use a weaker cipher.
This problem has occurred before and upstream provided the rationale
that other parts of
4 matches
Mail list logo
