[Ralf Jung]
> Hi,
>
> four years later, the -pulse package is still not in Debian. Is
> there any reason why the description is not change to match reality?
Just my lack of time to look properly after this package. If someone
got more time to spend on it, please go ahead. :)
I guess I should or
Hi,
four years later, the -pulse package is still not in Debian. Is there any
reason why the description is not change to match reality?
Kind regards,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
Hi.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 04:27:35PM +0200, CJ van den Berg wrote:
> Support for pulseaudio via libflashsupport is no longer required in
> Flash 10. Flash 10 works very well with the libasound2 pulse plugin and
> that is upstream’s recommended way to integrate applications that don’t
> provide “
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 01:53:04PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Joerg Friedrich]
> > Just out of curiosity, why is there need for an additional package
> > for pulseaudio? the this helper is capable of detecting the right
> > soundsystem.
>
> The reason we decided to make two packages, is
[Joerg Friedrich]
> Just out of curiosity, why is there need for an additional package
> for pulseaudio? the this helper is capable of detecting the right
> soundsystem.
The reason we decided to make two packages, is that the pulseaudio
people had forked the original module, fixed up the pulseaudi
Hi,
since there is no pulseaudio-version, I rebuild the
flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound for myself.
Just out of curiosity, why is there need for an additional package for
pulseaudio? the this helper is capable of detecting the right
soundsystem.
neccessary changes: - build-depend on libpulse-
[CJ van den Berg]
> -pulse was rejected with the request that I "coordinate better with
> the other maintainer". What we need to coordinate, I'm not sure.
Me neither. I believe we are pretty well coordinated already.
We can of course try to merge the two packages, but with two different
"upstrea
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Johan Walles]
> > Since I do want Pulse support, actually being able to find the
> > mentioned flashplugin-nonfree-pulse would be nice!
>
> Both was in NEW together. Not sure why flashplugin-nonfree-pulse did
> not make it. :
[Johan Walles]
> Since I do want Pulse support, actually being able to find the
> mentioned flashplugin-nonfree-pulse would be nice!
Both was in NEW together. Not sure why flashplugin-nonfree-pulse did
not make it. :(
Someone need to check with the pulseaudio team to figure out what
happened. C
Package: flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound
Version: 0.0.svn2431-3
Severity: normal
>From http://packages.debian.org/lenny/flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound:
"
For PulseAudio support, see flashplugin-nonfree-pulse.
"
However, there is no flashplugin-nonfree-pulse:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache searc
10 matches
Mail list logo
