Bug#478191: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#478191: Is this really the real fix, or only a workaround?

2008-05-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:41:50PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > >> I think increasing the limit is necessary since there appeared to be > >> some configurations which ran into the earlie

Bug#478191: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#478191: Is this really the real fix, or only a workaround?

2008-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I think increasing the limit is necessary since there appeared to be >> some configurations which ran into the earlier limit. Possibly 48kb is >> excessive, and it could be made smaller.

Bug#478191: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#478191: Is this really the real fix, or only a workaround?

2008-05-22 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 05:20:21PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I think increasing the limit is necessary since there appeared to be > some configurations which ran into the earlier limit. Possibly 48kb is > excessive, and it could be made smaller. I think the largest handshake > we saw in rea

Bug#478191: [Pkg-gnutls-maint] Bug#478191: Is this really the real fix, or only a workaround?

2008-05-22 Thread Simon Josefsson
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:24:29PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >> + Increase default handshake packet size limit to 48kb. Closes: #478191 > > I am wondering whether this is a real fix as it only postpones the > issue, and sending 50 KB of