Bug#478977: ratpoison: histories should be separate

2009-06-01 Thread Jan Braun
Bernhard R. Link schrob: > Well, an execute is an execute. Not having to remember which prompt was > used to get back to it is a feature in my eyes. (Though this feature was > mostly added because ratpoison has only one history file and there are > at least two histories to remember). Ok, if that'

Bug#478977: ratpoison: histories should be separate

2009-05-31 Thread Bernhard R. Link
package ratpoison forwarded 478977 ratpoison-de...@nongnu.org thanks * Jan Braun [090528 10:57]: > With 1.4.4-1, the original reporter's case "C-t : resize C-t ! UPARROW" > is fixed: resize appears only in the : history, not in the ! one. > However, the reverse case "C-t ! true C-t : UPARROW" sti

Bug#478977: ratpoison: histories should be separate

2009-05-28 Thread Jan Braun
Package: ratpoison Version: 1.4.4-1 Severity: normal Hi, With 1.4.4-1, the original reporter's case "C-t : resize C-t ! UPARROW" is fixed: resize appears only in the : history, not in the ! one. However, the reverse case "C-t ! true C-t : UPARROW" still(?) presents ":exec true" as an entry in the

Bug#478977: ratpoison: histories should be separate

2008-05-01 Thread Bruce V Chiarelli
Package: ratpoison Version: 1.4.3-1 Severity: minor The histories of the ratpoison command prompt (C-t :) and the shell command prompt (C-t !) are shared. This doesn't make any sense. For instance: 1. Start ratpoison. 2. Hit "C-t :" and type "resize". Hit escape. 3. Hit "C-t !" and hit the up ar