On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
> > alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
>
> maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
> possible to keep
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
> possible to keep an alternative in manual state, if you change
> priority, add or remove slave links?
Neither of these actions cause the manual status to change since
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > maybe this works for the simple case, but how is it technically
> > possible to keep an alternative in manual state, if you change
> > priority, add or remove slave links?
>
> Neither of these actions cause the manual status to
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 09:30:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 12:04:44PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > The proper approach is to only remove the alternative in prerm if $1 is
> > "remove" or "deconfigure".
>
> which exactly doesn't work when changes are made.
It w
Blars Blarson wrote:
> After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
> alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
I saw several times the same bug until I discovered that instead of
using update-alternatives, I should use update-java-alternatives.
tag 479950 + wontfix
thanks
if these are still overwritten, then update-alternatives should offer
a mode to update/add/remove slave links without changing the
alternative.
related bugs filed on dpkg might be 342566 and 388313.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Package: java-gcj-compat
Version: 1.0.78-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
*** Please type your report below this line ***
After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
alternative was overwritten from the previously selected sun java.
-- System Informat
tag 479950 + moreinfo
thanks
Blars Blarson writes:
> Package: java-gcj-compat
> Version: 1.0.78-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7.3
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> After upgrading my system, a java program failed to run because the java
> alternative was
8 matches
Mail list logo
