-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:01:53PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:52:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I believe that either tftp server should be a dependency only of
-standalone (and the tools deal properly with it
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:51:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 03:01:53PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:52:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I believe that either tftp server should be a dependency only of
-standalone (and the tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:23:33AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:51:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I'd like to install compilers without such hosts becoming
servers. That becomes tricky with your approach.
you
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:14:29PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:23:33AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 10:51:40AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
What is the logic behind the current package split? Why don't you
like the separate package
package ltsp-server
clone 480661 -1
retitle -1 ltsp-server: Please package bootstrapping scripts separate from
daemon recommendations
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:46:05PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
my *intent* is that the ltsp-server-standalone provides a
Package: ltsp-server
Severity: normal
I want to generate an alien-arch LTSP chroot on a separate host, and don't
want that other host to offer services.
ltsp-server seems to be the package to install, but that depends on tftp
server.
I believe that either tftp server should be a dependency only
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 02:52:08PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I believe that either tftp server should be a dependency only of -standalone
(and the tools deal properly with it potentially missing if they don't
already) or that the chroot compiler should be packaged in a separate
7 matches
Mail list logo
