severity 481123 wishlist
thanks
Excerpts from Andreas Amann's message of Mon Oct 26 07:51:55 -0400 2009:
> This seems not justified, and the better solution is in my opinion to
> simply not offer urxvtcd as x-terminal-emulator alternative.
I think you're right -- I was trying to implement Martin'
It seems that this bug (originally reported for rxvt-unicode 9.02-1+b1)
is the only reason for removing rxvt-unicode from testing, see
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rxvt-unicode/news/20091004T163944Z.html
This seems not justified, and the better solution is in my opinion to
simply not offer ur
also sprach martin f krafft [2009.09.09.1951 +0200]:
> Without such an option, urxvtc cannot be an x-terminal-emulator
> alternative, because x-terminal-emulator is expected not to return
> before the terminal window is closed.
The client side seems simple enough:
--- /src/rxvtc.C
+++ b/src/rxvt
severity 481123 serious
thanks
Without such an option, urxvtc cannot be an x-terminal-emulator
alternative, because x-terminal-emulator is expected not to return
before the terminal window is closed.
This also means that when urxvtc is called as x-terminal emulator,
the option should be in effect
4 matches
Mail list logo