Bug#482410: paq8l: Compression errors with -9 flag

2008-05-24 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Yes, reporting an improper flag to the user seems like a good idea. However, it's probably more urgent to update the man page, because it explicitly states that -9 is a valid option. :) Will probably get to it sunday evening. It's a busy weekend here -- Oh, look: rocks! --

Bug#482410: paq8l: Compression errors with -9 flag

2008-05-23 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Just got an e-mail from upstream. Valid options seem to be -0 to -8. Both the manpage and paq8l -h doesn't reflect this, but if you type paq8l by itself, it says: -- $ paq8l paq8l archiver (C) 2006, Matt Mahoney et al. Free under GPL,

Bug#482410: paq8l: Compression errors with -9 flag

2008-05-23 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 09:28:27AM +0200, Joop Stakenborg wrote: I hope this clarifies things. I wil probably make changes to the code, so it doesn't accept the -9 option. Yes, reporting an improper flag to the user seems like a good idea. However, it's probably more urgent to update the man

Bug#482410: paq8l: Compression errors with -9 flag

2008-05-22 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
Package: paq8l Version: 20070308-1 Severity: important When using high compression on files, even small ones like copies of /etc/passwd, the screen starts filling with errors like these: $ cd /tmp $ cp /etc/passwd . $ paq8l -9 passwd Transform fails at 0, input=0 decoded=0,

Bug#482410: paq8l: Compression errors with -9 flag

2008-05-22 Thread Joop Stakenborg
Thanks Todd, I will try to contact upstream about this. Regards, Joop pa3aba at debian dot org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]