Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-26 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cool, downloaded and installed - hopefully there is debugging info in the package... I'll do some runs and see that happens. Sorry, I forgot to build with debugging info. :/ Have you noticed any difference? Here is one such failure - this one is

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-09 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The current state (for me), is my amd64 servers (also clients) are running fine... some of my x86 machines are still experiencing a plethora of segfaults daily The private builds you did were gone, so I rebuilt the current package sans the strip

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-09 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: They are back again (was gone due to change of server for people.debian.org). Are you able to test this package again now? cool, downloaded and installed - hopefully there is debugging info in the package... I'll do some runs and see that

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-07 Thread Richard A Nelson
Further testing shows this same failure hitting on most of my x86 boxen I'm not yet sure it is the only one, but is deffinitely common. -- Rick Nelson Linux was made by foreign terrorists to take money from true US companies like Microsoft. - Some AOL'er. To this end we dedicate ourselves...

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-06 Thread Richard A Nelson
I was, fortunately, just prodded about this issue on IRC ;) The current state (for me), is my amd64 servers (also clients) are running fine... some of my x86 machines are still experiencing a plethora of segfaults daily The private builds you did were gone, so I rebuilt the current package

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-10-05 Thread Luk Claes
Hi Can we soon expect an upload fixing this bug? If not, please explain what's the status and how you think you will be able to fix it. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-09-04 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Howdy I've fetched a patch from upstream which fixes a leaking file descriptor, can you test the packages on my homepage [1]? Sure, but not until Tuesday ... the home machines seem to be doing ok after the last round of updates - and the office

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-09-04 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: Sure, but not until Tuesday ... the home machines seem to be doing ok after the last round of updates - and the office is powered down this 3day weekdend Hi, have you been able to test the new package on your other machines? Or any other

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-08-29 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: Cfengine2 2.2.8-1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, are you able to test this version as well? Upstream claims that they have been fixing an important threading error that has become

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-08-29 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: Hi, Howdy I've fetched a patch from upstream which fixes a leaking file descriptor, can you test the packages on my homepage [1]? Sure, but not until Tuesday ... the home machines seem to be doing ok after the last round of updates -

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-08-25 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ==12662== Invalid read of size 1 ==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x807A48E: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8053AC0: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent)

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-08-25 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Mon, 25 Aug 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: Cfengine2 2.2.8-1 was uploaded to unstable a few days ago, are you able to test this version as well? Upstream claims that they have been fixing an important threading error that has become apparent with the influx of multicore processors.

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-08-01 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi. I rebuild cfengine 2 with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip to get debug information included in the binaries. Are you able to rerun your test with valgrind using these binaries (or binaries you build yourself using the above environment variable)? It hopefully will provide more information on

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-06-25 Thread Morten Werner Forsbring
Richard A Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Package: cfengine2 Version: 2.2.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable + possible data loss ==12662== Invalid read of size 1 ==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-06-25 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Morten Werner Forsbring wrote: ==12662== Invalid read of size 1 ==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x807A48E: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8053AC0: (within

Bug#482439: cfengine2: There are still a ton of segfaults

2008-05-22 Thread Richard A Nelson
Package: cfengine2 Version: 2.2.6-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable + possible data loss ==12662== Invalid read of size 1 ==12662==at 0x80778C8: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x8077A8A: (within /usr/sbin/cfagent) ==12662==by 0x807A48E: (within