On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:53 -0200, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
wrote:
> Just for the record, I'm rechecking all the patches and
> refactoring the packaging for the new version, and mod_logio is
> one of the patches that I might not include or I will provide a
> separate webalizer binary
> Just for the record, I'm rechecking all the patches and
> refactoring the packaging for the new version, and mod_logio is
> one of the patches that I might not include or I will provide a
> separate webalizer binary, because it is not really common and
> I got quite a few complains because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13-01-2009 19:19, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:25 +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
>> According to
>>
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482771
>>
>> there are a couple bugs in the mod_logio Webalizer patch you
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 12:25 +0100, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
> According to
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482771
>
> there are a couple bugs in the mod_logio Webalizer patch you wrote.
>
> "However the totals calculated by webalizer for these fields
> (described as kB In a
Hello Bojan,
According to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482771
there are a couple bugs in the mod_logio Webalizer patch you wrote.
"However the totals calculated by webalizer for these fields
(described as kB In and kB Out) are wrong because of two bugs. First,
the incoming
5 matches
Mail list logo
