Hi,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 11:57:14AM +0930, Ron wrote:
[long explanation skip]
Gah, in some moment i read the comment about DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR,
and then forgot about it when working further in the problem.
...
It does seem to me that any fix here should not just cripple the
flavour
Hi Ron,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:30:19PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Package: wxwidgets2.6
Version: 2.6.3.2.2-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Hi!
Ana Guerrero schrieb:
DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR := $(shell pwd | sed -e '[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/wxwidgets[0-9.]\+-\?\(.*\)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@')
[..]
Ideal fix would be fixing the whole debian/rules, but given the release time
we are it is not good idea make big changes in the package. I gould go for
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:34:53PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
Ana Guerrero schrieb:
DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR := $(shell pwd | sed -e '[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/wxwidgets[0-9.]\+-\?\(.*\)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@')
[..]
Ideal fix would be fixing the whole debian/rules, but given the release
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2008 at 10:34:53PM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Hi!
Ana Guerrero schrieb:
DEBIAN_WXFLAVOUR := $(shell pwd | sed -e '[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/wxwidgets[0-9.]\+-\?\(.*\)[EMAIL PROTECTED]@')
[..]
Hi Ana, Alexander,
Thanks a lot for looking into this! I guess I should explain a bit of
the context to make it clear why we don't want to just disable this
entirely ...
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:14:14AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 12:21:57AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
Package: wxwidgets2.6
Version: 2.6.3.2.2-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20080527 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
i386.
Relevant part:
running build_py
running install_lib
7 matches
Mail list logo
