Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net writes:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
* Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils? This is
just vanity. Please, ship the upstream software,
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
* Why all of the Debian-specific
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
* Why all of the Debian-specific utilities in debian/utils? This is
just vanity. Please, ship the
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
Package: mldonkey
Severity: normal
mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
unnecessary and causes bugs.
* Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:06:33AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 09:39:20AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
* Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
it, mldonkey is
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 10:54:10AM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:32:48PM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
* Why all of the Debian-specific
merge 332324 484674
thanks
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
unnecessary and causes bugs.
* Why so many debconf questions?
You're right. Maybe we can simplify this a bit. We are currently
working on this
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:05:41AM +0200, spiral voice wrote:
Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
it, mldonkey is a *p2p client*. It should be run by normal
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:14:25PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 0, Forest Bond for...@alittletooquiet.net wrote:
mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
unnecessary and causes bugs.
* Why so many debconf questions?
You're right. Maybe we can simplify
Hi,
Forest Bond schrieb:
Can you point me to some documentation of the multiuser functionality?
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/mldonkey/distrib/multiuser.txt?root=mldonkeyview=markup
Cheers, spiralvoice
__
Nur
Hi,
Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
it, mldonkey is a *p2p client*. It should be run by normal users
when they want to connect to a p2p network.
YVMV, but MLDonkey is also designed to
Package: mldonkey
Severity: normal
mldonkey packaging is way to complicated and bloated. This is
unnecessary and causes bugs.
* Why does mldonkey-server need an init script? Yes, it's a daemon,
but that is merely an implementation detail. When it comes down to
it, mldonkey is a *p2p
12 matches
Mail list logo
