On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:11:30PM +, Tim Retout wrote:
> Given that the maintainer seems to have changed since this Debian bug
> was opened, I thought it might be worth asking: can we consider removing
> the tarball-within-a-tarball approach in the icedove source package?
>
> It's inconvenien
I needed it to play "Pandora Radio". Thanks
so much for your feedback and I am trying to learn this stuff! Peace-out, src
-Original Message-
From: Tim Retout
To: 485...@bugs.debian.org
Sent: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 5:11 am
Subject: Bug#485167: embedded tarball in icedove's o
Given that the maintainer seems to have changed since this Debian bug
was opened, I thought it might be worth asking: can we consider removing
the tarball-within-a-tarball approach in the icedove source package?
It's inconvenient for development, and the single tarball is getting
repacked anyway t
3 matches
Mail list logo
