On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 )
>
> - We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on
> $(year).$(month).x
>where "x" is 0 for a release or any higher number for a patched version.
>
> - In Unix-typ
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I prefer to keep the ECL situation as it is now: Debian ships only one
> version, which is the latest release [1].
Luca, I think you are thinking too way ahead. Currently, there is no Debian
program that depends on an sp
Hi Juanjo!
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:10:10 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll play the Devil's advocate here, sorry: does this mean that 0.1.0
> will be SONAME-compatible with 0.1.1?
>
> The SONAME only uses the
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:38:13 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> > Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 )
> >
> > - We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on
> $(year).$(month).x
> >where "x" is 0 for a re
Hi Juanjo!
Why didn't I wait for ten more minutes before sending my previous mail?
I'd have seen you already fixed it, thank you!
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:55:30 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank you. If I cou
Hi Juanjo!
On Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:51:30 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> Well, for one I do not believe in LSB. At least I do not believe
> people are going to include ECL in the list of required software by
> the LSB committee, and that implies no program can expect it is going
> to have t
Last change in CVS ( 2008/09/09 )
- We switch to an Ubuntu-like versioning system, based on
$(year).$(month).x
where "x" is 0 for a release or any higher number for a patched version.
- In Unix-type systems, ECL now installs with a "soname" and using
versioned
directory names, such as /us
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, I really think SONAME's decision belongs to developers, not to
> > package maintainers. Let's say that Debian uses a SONAME of 0.1 while
> > Ubuntu 0.2 [1]: then every effort done with the LSB [2] is lost.
>
>
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Juanjo!
>
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:41:25 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configur
Hi Juanjo!
On Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:41:25 +0200, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configuration
>>> option that operating systems may provide.
>>
>> Sorry, I'm not a ski
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Luca Capello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That is not something ECL has to provide. It is more a configuration
>> option that operating systems may provide.
>
> Sorry, I'm not a skilled programmed, but I don't understand why this is
> not ECL task: ECL provides the
11 matches
Mail list logo
