On Fr, 02 Jan 2009, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> I have only a not-so-recent laptop. Building a TL package on that box
> will be a pain. Aside from that I've no clue how to build the TL
> packages ;-(
Ok, will try it ASAP.
Best wishes
Norbert
-
On 02.01.09 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On Di, 30 Dez 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > The change is rather minimal: I just added the file to the list
> > of to be renamed files.
>
> Ok, the problem is I have no laptop, so I cannot do that ATM. If
> someone else can build a
Hi Hilmar,
On Di, 30 Dez 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> The change is rather minimal: I just added the file to the list of to
> be renamed files.
Ok, the problem is I have no laptop, so I cannot do that ATM. If someone
else can build a new package, give it a test run and upload it fine.
Otherwise
On 27.12.08 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote:
> On Di, 23 Dez 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi Norbert,
> > > In other words: We move fmt.d/01tetex.cnf to
> > > fmt.d/01tetex.cnf.obsolete. Either this is the worng[1]
> > > filename, or rather we had both...
> > >
> > I guess we rather ha
Hi Hilmar,
On Di, 23 Dez 2008, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > In other words: We move fmt.d/01tetex.cnf to
> > fmt.d/01tetex.cnf.obsolete. Either this is the worng[1] filename, or
> > rather we had both...
> >
> I guess we rather had both anywhere in between. I've expanded the
> texlive-common.postins
On 06.11.08 Frank Küster (fr...@debian.org) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
> > Any further ideas?
>
> One and a half.
>
> One: We already do that.
>
> $ egrep -v '^$|^#' texlive-base/debian/texlive-common.postinst.pre
> for i in updmap.d/10tetex-base.cfg fmt.d/01tetex.cnf language.d/00t
On 06.11.08 Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> > Any further ideas?
>
> One and a half.
>
> Half: Looking for specific files (here: 00tetex.cnf) without
> DebPkgProvidedMaps. This would, however, create a danger of getting
> back to mainta
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, the postinst- and preinst scripts of teTeX in Debian are/were
> rather a nightmare regarding "which files have to be
> removed/fixed/changed to resurrect mistakes made before". You may
> have a look at them just for fun.
A strange kind of fun, th
On Do, 06 Nov 2008, Omer Zak wrote:
> I am glad to see that the general problem is being addressed and the
> answer is not just "remove by hand the offending 00tetex.cnf file".
As Hilmar pointed out. The *released* packages of teTeX didn't have this
problem. You seem to have used intermediate or t
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 23:29 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > According to dpkg -S, 00tetex.cnf belongs to no package. The
> > laptop has been running Debian Testing for few years (Sarge
> > Testing, then Etch Testing, and now Lenny Testing), so it
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
> > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > > total 28
> > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3
On 04.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi,
> > > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > > total 28
> > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Nov 3 16:10 .
> > > drwxr-xr-x 21 root root 4096 Nov 3 15:
On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 17:42 +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> On 03.11.08 Omer Zak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > omega omega - omega.ini
> > lambda omega language.datlambda.ini
> >
> Here is the omega.
>
> > /etc/texmf/fmt.d:
> > total 28
> >
13 matches
Mail list logo
