Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Can you still reproduce this? I can't see anything wrong with the events
> nor with the rules. Upgrading to 0.124-3 will hopefully not hurt...
I can't reproduce it with 2.6.25-2 and 0.124-2.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Jun 23, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have reproduced this on two machines, both running 2.6.25-2.
> A third machine, running 2.6.24, got /dev/fuse chgrped correctly.
Can you still reproduce this? I can't see anything wrong with the events
nor with the rules. Upgrading to 0.124-3 wil
On Jun 25, Michael Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real "problem" seem to be, that the GROUP entry of "fuse" in
> "/etc/udev/permissions.rules" is ignored if the group "fuse" doesn't
> exist (while the config is parsed). But, the "fuse" group is first
> created by the "fuse-utils" pac
Am 24.06.2008, 20:54 Uhr, schrieb Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Jun 24, Michael Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Had the same problem on 2.6.24-1 and udev 0.114-2. Solved it by adding
line:
KERNEL=="fuse", NAME="%k"
This is just a no-op.
Yes, you are right. Bu
On Jun 24, Michael Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Had the same problem on 2.6.24-1 and udev 0.114-2. Solved it by adding
> line:
>
> KERNEL=="fuse", NAME="%k"
This is just a no-op.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Had the same problem on 2.6.24-1 and udev 0.114-2. Solved it by adding
line:
KERNEL=="fuse", NAME="%k"
to /etc/udev/udev.rules . Now, the already exisiting line:
KERNEL=="fuse", GROUP="fuse"
in /etc/udev/permissions.rules seems to take effe
Package: udev
Version: 0.114-2
Severity: normal
I installed fuse-utils and ssh, and am in group fuse.
fuse: failed to open /dev/fuse: Permission denied
/dev/fuse is:
crw-rw 1 root root 10, 229 Jun 23 15:00 /dev/fuse
I'm not sure why this is happening; /etc/udev/permissions.rules has a
line
7 matches
Mail list logo
