Hi,
Uncle! I yield.
> That aside (depth-first search can be tweaked to work with conflict
> tracking etc), another problem is that your suggestion produces arguably
> suboptimal results when a higher-priority package requires a
> lower-priority one, because the locally optimal choice l
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:00:11AM -0400, C Sights was
heard to say:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:46:56AM -0500, C Sights
> > was
> heard to say:
> > > Aptitude is also ignoring the priority of the repositories:
> > > experimental=1 and unstable=500. This behavior is bug #473296
Hi,
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:46:56AM -0500, C Sights was
heard to say:
> > > > # LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libgnutls26
> > > > libgnutls26:
> > > > Installed: 2.2.5-1
> > > > Candidate: 2.2.5-1
> > > > Version table:
> > > > 2.4.0-2 0
> > > > 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org u
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:46:56AM -0500, C Sights was
heard to say:
> > > # LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libgnutls26
> > > libgnutls26:
> > > Installed: 2.2.5-1
> > > Candidate: 2.2.5-1
> > > Version table:
> > > 2.4.0-2 0
> > > 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
> > # LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libgnutls26
> > libgnutls26:
> > Installed: 2.2.5-1
> > Candidate: 2.2.5-1
> > Version table:
> > 2.4.0-2 0
> > 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages
> > 2.4.0-1 0
> > 1 http://ftp.debian.org ../project/experimental/mai
5 matches
Mail list logo