-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> You are right, Martin, the bug should not be closed before either the >> code is changed to not depend on a specific order is at least >> documented. >> >> And you are wrong, Peter, that it will never change: I just fixed the >> code! > >Dammit. :-) > >No really, it's good to fix this if we can within reason. But in a >general sense, if you use the tools wrongly you will get suboptimal >results.
In the very broad sense, yes. But it is wrong to generally expect CDBS snippets to require a certain order. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAknCH7EACgkQn7DbMsAkQLjwzACgguu63s75O/GDC+ql0erihJ5A AJYAoKM4+QZxo/WyVDmZekxH1SWJ9RwX =vOWT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org