Am 13.07.2008 um 12:09 schrieb Christoph Burgmer:
> Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2008 schrieb Francois Marier:
>> > If there is no otherway to work around the possible bad behaviour please
>> > at least tell your users what to do, as I assume this package attracts
>> > rather inexperienced users due to th
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2008 schrieb Francois Marier:
> > If there is no otherway to work around the possible bad behaviour please
> > at least tell your users what to do, as I assume this package attracts
> > rather inexperienced users due to the nature of the task.
>
> If I understand you corre
Hi Chris,
> If there is no otherway to work around the possible bad behaviour please at
> least tell your users what to do, as I assume this package attracts rather
> inexperienced users due to the nature of the task.
If I understand you correctly, you'd like to see a clearer debconf message.
Wha
Package: safe-rm
Version: 0.2-4
Followup-For: Bug #489690
Guys,
I wanted to check safe-rm when installing the package with other updates. On
installation time it told me to rather abort as it may leave my system
without /bin/rm, so I selected "yes" as proposed. Then aptitude didn't
commence insta
4 matches
Mail list logo
