Package: bash-doc Version: 3.2-4 Severity: important GFDL or not, the Bash documentation is important and worthwhile. If you do not believe that it can be packaged as free software, is there any reason not to upload it to non-free? Given that bash-doc USED to contain useful and worthwhile documentation, how hard can it be to change the name to bash-doc-nonfree and upload it into non-free? If you don't want to touch it, I would love to do so if you or someone would sponsor the thing.
Whether you like the GFDL or not, obliterating the documentation for GNU software that is an essential part of the system rather than moving it to non-free is non-sensical. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.25 (SMP w/4 CPU cores; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
