Bug#491723: StatusNet package upload?

2013-02-02 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
[taking Andreas out of the loop, hope this is fine] Hi, On 28/01/13 22:04, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Leo, Brenda, can either of you let us know about this package? Oh man... at one point I really thought I would get this package in good shape, but after Roland's poke I merged from upstream and noti

Bug#491723: StatusNet package upload?

2013-01-28 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Andreas, thanks for the update Leo, Brenda, can either of you let us know about this package? I see Brenda owns the RFP/ITP bug, but Leo is the one who has built packages in git://git.debian.org/~costela/statusnet.git Evan, I notice in the bug tr

Bug#491723: StatusNet package upload?

2013-01-28 Thread Andreas Schildbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sorry, I gave up on packaging several years ago. Cannot not even remember that I intended to package this - strange... Thanks for asking. If you decide to do it, I wish you all best of luck! On 01/28/2013 09:07 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Hi Andreas

Bug#491723: StatusNet package upload?

2013-01-28 Thread Evan Prodromou
Daniel, There's a package here: http://people.debian.org/~costela/packages/ I'm not sure if it's appropriate to give the package to an XMPP group since the software is not primarily XMPP-based. -Evan On 13-01-28 03:07 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256

Bug#491723: StatusNet package upload?

2013-01-28 Thread Daniel Pocock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Andreas, Can you please let me know about the status of the package - are you still ITP? Or would you prefer somebody else to take over? Or is there some blocking issue? I'm actually doing a joint session with Evan (StatusNet founder/upstrea

Bug#491723: debian/copyright for statusnet

2012-09-24 Thread Roland Mas
Leo 'costela' Antunes, 2012-03-26 14:59:13 +0200 : > On 23/03/12 22:25, Roland Mas wrote: >> I was somewhat bored and I wanted to play with config-edit stuff; since >> I'm also eager to see statusnet enter Debian officially, I spent some >> time reading copyright notices and transcribing them. He

Bug#491723: sorry!

2012-04-11 Thread anarcat
Oops! Sorry for that last message, meant to subscribe to this bug report. :) Thanks for the hard work, can't wait to see this enter debian! A. -- We are discreet sheep; we wait to see how the drove is going, and then go with the drove. - Mark Twain signature.asc Descri

Bug#491723: s

2012-04-11 Thread anarcat
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#491723: debian/copyright for statusnet

2012-03-26 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 23/03/12 22:25, Roland Mas wrote: > I was somewhat bored and I wanted to play with config-edit stuff; since > I'm also eager to see statusnet enter Debian officially, I spent some > time reading copyright notices and transcribing them. Here's what git > produced (I have no idea if it's actually

Bug#491723: debian/copyright for statusnet

2012-03-26 Thread Roland Mas
And a fix for an error. >From 524719cfe8b33c861113e1b6cfac0c82cf25c605 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roland Mas Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:53:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] debian/* is not copyright StatusNet To: 491...@bugs.debian.org Cc: cost...@debian.org, lola...@debian.org --- debian/copyri

Bug#491723: extlib also needed

2011-12-20 Thread Jeremy Malcolm
Oh, and as well as /scripts, /extlib is also needed. That will get rid of the lib/xmppmanager.php error that I'd earlier reported. -- Jeremy Malcolm PhD LLB (Hons) B Com Internet and Open Source lawyer, consumer advocate, geek host -t NAPTR 5.9.8.5.2.8.2.2.1.0.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'

Bug#491723: Feedback

2011-12-17 Thread Jeremy Malcolm
The current git code looks good, except that you need to package the "scripts" directory too. That's got a lot of important things like the daemons. Also, it would be nice to package an init script to run startdaemons.sh and stopdaemons.sh. I'm not attaching one, because I'm not sure where yo

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2011-12-07 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Just a FYI: The package is almost ready, the only thing missing before I can do an official upload is the debian/copyright file. There's a lot of manual work involved and I can't seem to find the time to sit down and do it (and honestly, the motivation isn't exactly brimming for this specific kind

Bug#491723: (no subject)

2011-10-22 Thread Roland Hieber
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:47:18 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: > It seems the package was not uploaded to experimental, or I am unable > to find it ? Is there something blocking upload ? Neither was I, but statusnet-0.9.9-1 from [1] seems to do its job quite good. I would like to see it in the offici

Bug#491723:

2011-06-02 Thread Michael Scherer
It seems the package was not uploaded to experimental, or I am unable to find it ? Is there something blocking upload ? -- Michael Scherer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2011-04-10 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 30/03/11 20:54, Marcelo Jorge Vieira wrote: > > What do you think about upload status.net package to experimental? Yeah, I was waiting for some manifestation of approval or otherwise from Evan or Brenda, but since nobody seems to have anything against it, I'll upload it in the coming week.

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2011-03-30 Thread Marcelo Jorge Vieira
Hi everybody, On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 22:00 +0100, Torsten Grote wrote: > On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:46:13 Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > > First of all thanks for taking a look at the package! > > Thanks everybody who has done some work so far on this package. I'd like to > know what the cur

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2011-02-08 Thread Torsten Grote
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 14:46:13 Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > First of all thanks for taking a look at the package! Thanks everybody who has done some work so far on this package. I'd like to know what the currect status is. Leo, did you and Evan work together on the packaging? The lates

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-10-27 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi, First of all thanks for taking a look at the package! On 27/10/10 00:54, Brenda Wallace wrote: > The previous repo was a clone of the main project, plus debian > folder+Makefile. > If you have a process for managing merging fixed, then no problem. > you're going to put tarballs over top? I'

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-10-26 Thread Brenda Wallace
The previous repo was a clone of the main project, plus debian folder+Makefile. If you have a process for managing merging fixed, then no problem. you're going to put tarballs over top? On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > There are still a couple of open questions: >

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-10-24 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hi again, On 23/09/10 14:28, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: >> Can we work together on this? > > Sure! Absolutely! > Starting next week I'll take a look at the git.d.o code and see if I can > help out with anything. I'll also be around #statusnet. After some delays, I've finally managed to sit dow

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-09-23 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
On 23/09/10 04:57, Evan Prodromou wrote: > So, I realize my previous email was too confrontational. Maybe a bit... :) > I guess what I'm saying is there are some tough issues; I'd like to get > them resolved; and it will take a number of people to do it. That's what I imagined. Don't take me wro

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-09-22 Thread Evan Prodromou
So, I realize my previous email was too confrontational. I guess what I'm saying is there are some tough issues; I'd like to get them resolved; and it will take a number of people to do it. Can we work together on this? -Evan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-09-22 Thread Evan Prodromou
I don't know who you are, what other packages you're familiar with, and why you want to take this on now. You don't seem to have done any other Web or PHP packages. Is that true? What's your familiarity with StatusNet? I'd be happy to see you help out with the git project -- we need some energy

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-09-22 Thread Brenda Wallace
No objectins from me.. there is something already on git.debian.org you can start from. On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Leo 'costela' Antunes wrote: > Hey, > > Just another ping regarding the Status.net Debian package. > The ownership of the bug has been bouncing around for the last few > months

Bug#491723: Status.net Debian Package

2010-09-22 Thread Leo 'costela' Antunes
Hey, Just another ping regarding the Status.net Debian package. The ownership of the bug has been bouncing around for the last few months without any visible manifestation of progress, so I thought I might try my hand at it, but before that I wanted to make sure there's no ongoing work by someone

Bug#491723: Debian packaging

2010-08-16 Thread Daniel Dehennin
Hello, Is there any progression on the packaging? I can make some tests and help in packaging, I'm not a Debian developer but package myself with CDBS and now a little about dbconfig-commom. Regards. -- Daniel Dehennin Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0x6A2540D1

Bug#491723: Update?

2010-01-19 Thread Kartik Mistry
Hi Evan & all, Any update on this package's ITP? I can co-maintain this along with you (or get some interested people) if you want :) -- Cheers, Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_ Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Identica: @kartikm Blogs: {ftbfs, kartikm}.wordpress.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Bug#491723: request and intention to package statusnet distributed microblogging tool

2009-12-24 Thread Jelle de Jong
Hello everybody, I read in the bugreport thread that Evan as one of the orignal developers intended to start packaging statusnet himself. I have been following the thread now for almost 10 months, and I am interested in how the process is going behind the scenes? Can we expect a Debian release of

Bug#491723: Updates

2009-11-23 Thread Sam Johnston
Any updates on the status of the laconica aka statusnet package? Sam

Bug#491723:

2009-03-13 Thread Andreas Schildbach
It looks like as if there is already a rudimentary lenny package: http://www.verne.me/content/howto-laconica-debian-lenny (scroll to the bottom of the page) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

Bug#491723: Upstream author

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Watkins
owner 491723 e...@debian.org thanks On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 15:35 -0500, Evan Prodromou wrote: > I'm the upstream author and also a DD. I'd prefer to package this myself. All yours. Dan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#491723: Upstream author

2009-02-17 Thread Evan Prodromou
I'm the upstream author and also a DD. I'd prefer to package this myself. -Evan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#491723: Ping?

2009-02-15 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hello, On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 02:54:46PM +, Daniel Watkins wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:04 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > > Could you please give a status update of this ITP? > > Sorry to bother you again. > > Apologies for not answering your previous email, I seem to have lost it > s

Bug#491723: Ping?

2009-02-12 Thread Daniel Watkins
Hi Paul, On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 14:04 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote: > Could you please give a status update of this ITP? > Sorry to bother you again. Apologies for not answering your previous email, I seem to have lost it somehow. Last time I looked at this (a while ago), this ITP was waiting on

Bug#491723: Ping?

2009-02-12 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hello, Could you please give a status update of this ITP? Sorry to bother you again. Kind regards, Paul -- PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: pau...@debian.org University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: p...@luon.net >>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG

Bug#491723: Status of the ITP?

2009-01-15 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hi! What is the current status of this ITP? Are there issues to be resolved, can I help by testing it on a Lenny of Etch installation? Kind regards, Paul -- PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: pau...@debian.org University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: p...@luon.net >

Bug#491723: ITP: laconica -- distributed microblogging tool

2008-08-03 Thread Daniel Watkins
I have claimed and converted the RFP at bug #491723. All that has changed from that RFP is the Version number. * Package name: laconica Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Evan Prodromou and others * URL : http://laconi.ca/ * License : GNU Affero General Public

Bug#491723: RFP: laconica -- distributed microblogging tool

2008-07-21 Thread Andreas Schildbach
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: laconica Version : 0.4.4 Upstream Author : Evan Prodromou and others * URL : http://laconi.ca/ * License : GNU Affero General Public License Programming Lang: PHP Description : distributed microblogging t