Hi,
On Thursday 04 September 2008 16:52, maximilian attems wrote:
So bug severity is based on timing now?
great take things out of context.
2.6.26 is released and 2.6.27 merge window is over.
for any one wanting to work on this issue the tree is open for 2.6.28,
checkout linux-next for
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 06:11:12PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
vote 2006-007 only established an exception for etch, but not for the
following releases. So why do you think this is not relevant for lenny?
Are you planning a GR? ;)
It wouldn't be that bad. It would probably pass, but
severity 493925 wishlist
stop
On Wed, 06 Aug 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
Now that it seems clear 2.6.26 will be the version used for the release, I'd
like to bring back attention on pruning it from code under DFSG violation,
GPL-incompatible, or unlicensed blobs.
as always stupid Debian wolf
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:14:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
severity 493925 wishlist
stop
I don't want to play BTS ping-pong, but this severity change is not right.
Would you please revert it?
as always stupid Debian wolf crying - disconnected from upstream work.
checkout 2.6.27-rcX
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 02:14:28PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
severity 493925 wishlist
stop
I don't want to play BTS ping-pong, but this severity change is not right.
Would you please revert it?
if it would.
as always stupid Debian wolf
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Now that it seems clear 2.6.26 will be the version used for the release, I'd
like to bring back attention on pruning it from code under DFSG violation,
GPL-incompatible, or unlicensed blobs.
Based on maks mail in:
6 matches
Mail list logo
