Bug#494687: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions

2008-08-16 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2008-08-16 05:05:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Because you don't want to use the type1 module anyway. I didn't choose it myself. I took what Debian's configuration system suggested by default. So, there's probably a bug there. -- Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web:

Bug#494687: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions

2008-08-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 18:01:41 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2008-08-11 15:45:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: You're mixing the x server from etch with libxfont1 from lenny/sid, where the type1 font rasterizer isn't built. I don't think this is a bug (technically the libXfont ABI

Bug#494687: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions

2008-08-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.1.1-21etch5 Severity: normal I get the following error in Xorg.0.log: (II) LoadModule: type1 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so dlopen: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions (EE) Failed

Bug#494687: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions

2008-08-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 15:05:42 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: Package: xserver-xorg-core Version: 2:1.1.1-21etch5 Severity: normal I get the following error in Xorg.0.log: (II) LoadModule: type1 (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so dlopen:

Bug#494687: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/fonts/libtype1.so: undefined symbol: Type1RegisterFontFileFunctions

2008-08-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2008-08-11 15:45:25 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: You're mixing the x server from etch with libxfont1 from lenny/sid, where the type1 font rasterizer isn't built. I don't think this is a bug (technically the libXfont ABI changed incompatibly, but...). Why isn't there a dependency rule that