Bug#496759: libts-dev: tslib-0.0.pc should reflect real version

2008-08-28 Thread arne anka
xglamo is not yet in Debian? no. it was mentioned only to illustrate how i stumbled over the issue (and to provide additional information if useful). The name is just a name, it does not have to relate to the current SONAME or anything else. Also, the name cannot be changed within Debian

Bug#496759: libts-dev: tslib-0.0.pc should reflect real version

2008-08-28 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 13:46 +0200, arne anka wrote: The name is just a name, it does not have to relate to the current SONAME or anything else. Also, the name cannot be changed within Debian without also changing every other reverse dependency (i.e. a library transition). I see no point in

Bug#496759: libts-dev: tslib-0.0.pc should reflect real version

2008-08-27 Thread debian
Package: libts-dev Version: 1.0-4 Severity: normal i tried to build xglamo yesterday -- but configure repeatedly failed while looking for package tslib-1.0. further investigation revealed that the package in fact was named tslib-0.0.pcs and the Version: line inside said Version: 0.0.2 i don't

Bug#496759: libts-dev: tslib-0.0.pc should reflect real version

2008-08-27 Thread Neil Williams
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 10:54 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Package: libts-dev Version: 1.0-4 Severity: normal i tried to build xglamo yesterday -- but configure repeatedly failed while looking for package tslib-1.0. xglamo is not yet in Debian? In that case, xglamo needs to be modified to