-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:02:56PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
handle the same file. It complained that it was unable to get a lock,
and so couldn't
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 20:34 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:02:56PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
handle the same file. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
The logic expressed in the #gnucash discussion is bogus. Errors like
ENLNK or EMLNK would also prevent link but not prevent copying. There
is no harm in at least trying copying if EROFS comes in, and the
The logic expressed in the #gnucash discussion is bogus. Errors like
ENLNK or EMLNK would also prevent link but not prevent copying. There
is no harm in at least trying copying if EROFS comes in, and the code
shouldn't assume that every error on link will be an error on copying.
Thomas
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
But also, there is most certainly an sshfs bug here. It has no business
whatsoever returning ENOSYS in response to a link call.
I tried to figure out who is doing wrong here. If at all it's the fault
of fuse,
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 23:39 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
There are far better error codes to return.
... what error codes listed in the link(2) manpage do you think of?
The best one that comes to my mind is EPERM: The filesystem containing
oldpath and newpath does not support the creation of
Package: gnucash
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes data loss
I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
handle the same file. It complained that it was unable to get a lock,
and so couldn't prevent simultaneous writes. This was no problem,
because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
forwarded 496807 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549595
thanks
Hi Bas,
thank you for your feedback on Gnucash.
I have forwarded your report to the upstream bug tracker as
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=549595
Regards
Micha
On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:46 +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
Package: gnucash
Version: 2.2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes data loss
I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
handle the same file. It complained that it was unable to get a lock,
and so
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 01:02:56PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
I was trying to use gnucash over sshfs, to allow several machines to
handle the same file. It complained that it was unable to get a lock,
and so couldn't prevent simultaneous writes. This was no problem,
because there
10 matches
Mail list logo
