Hi Doug,
Firstly, thanks for you quick responses.
> Since I don't support it any more, and it does not work with some
> language constructs from the newer versions of Python, I'm not sure
> you want to include it any longer. I'll leave it up to you whether or
> not to pull it out of your r
On Sep 8, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
Hi Doug,
Hi,
I understand you are the upstream maintainer of HappyDoc.
Yes, that's right.
This bug is marked "release critical", meaning that the package is not
releasable in this state and will not ship with the upcoming Lenny
release.
On Sep 8, 2008, at 4:21 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
The source for HappyDoc is available under a BSD license.
After reading the ticket, though, I see that at least one of the files
referenced was not original source from me. The StructuredText
package was released by Zope, Corp. and may h
Hi Doug,
I understand you are the upstream maintainer of HappyDoc.
In the Debian system, there is an outstanding issue with the HappyDoc
package where some of the files distributed in the python-happydoc package
refer to licences that are missing from the tarball. You can read the entire
details
4 matches
Mail list logo
