Robert Luberda dixit:
>However I have never checked if it's true that POSIX doesn't specify what
>happens in this case. But if it is, debconf should be fixed not to use
>such constructions, I think.
Right. Many people assume POSIX shells are similar to Bourne shells, but
the Korn shells often di
Hi,
>
> IIRC pdksh seemed to work in my sid box, while ksh not. However I am not now
> at
> that box. Trying again here in an etch box pdksh fails. I will try again in a
> sid
> box when possible. I may have messed up the names with all the sh changes.
>
There were similar bug in pdksh repo
tags 499139 = upstream confirmed fixed-upstream patch
retitle 499139 mksh closes file descriptors > 2 on exec
thanks
Dixi quod…
>This seems to be related to #154540 – found after I got the information
>that it only happens to pdksh with FSH not set.
It in fact is. This is fixed upstream with cha
tags 499139 -help +upstream +confirmed
thanks
This seems to be related to #154540 – found after I got the information
that it only happens to pdksh with FSH not set.
Would a fix for this bug be worth a freeze exception? Otherwise, I’ll
just fix it upstream, and the Debian package would be updated
Agustin Martin dixit:
>/bin# ln -sf pdksh sh
>
>and keep the shebang lines pointing to /bin/sh the test script runs (no hang
>and no error signalled, even with '-e' flag enabled in both scripts, and the
>right return value shown). However, if I explicitly change the shebang lines
>scripts seem to
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:51:47PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Agustin Martin dixit:
>
> >I may have messed up the names with all the sh changes.
>
> I just changed the shebang lines instead ;)
> Note /bin/ksh is a symbolic link, thus shouldn't be needed to be tested.
I am re-trying with pdk
Agustin Martin dixit:
>I may have messed up the names with all the sh changes.
I just changed the shebang lines instead ;)
Note /bin/ksh is a symbolic link, thus shouldn't be needed to be tested.
>The simple way to keep everybody joined is to abuse he BTS, reassigning bug
>report to e.g. 'mksh,p
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 08:06:44PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> tags 499139 +help
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I verified #499139 with mksh, pdksh and ??? interestingly enough ??? AT&T
> ksh93
> on Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable.
>
> I wonder if the file descriptor magic of debconf is at fault he
tags 499139 +help
thanks
Hi,
I verified #499139 with mksh, pdksh and – interestingly enough – AT&T ksh93
on Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable.
I wonder if the file descriptor magic of debconf is at fault here instead,
as, usually, the ksh93 behaviour is “right”.
As I barely know debconf at all,
9 matches
Mail list logo