On Fri, 2 May 2014, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> God no. DMARC is just broken by design. We should no in any way support it.
We don't have to "support DMARC" as such, it would enough if lists.debian.org
didn't send messages having DKIM signatures that do not verify.
OTOH, if we are going to boycott D
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
> severity 500965 normal
> thanks
>
> For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
> others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
> and at least Yahoo is actually rejecting messages failing these kind
> of
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:51:43AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Hmm. Can you elaborate on that? Do you consider that if I sign a
> > message and you want to modify it, am I to blame that you can't modify
> > it? Or else: If you modify it anyway, am I t
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hmm. Can you elaborate on that? Do you consider that if I sign a
> message and you want to modify it, am I to blame that you can't modify
> it? Or else: If you modify it anyway, am I to blame that the signature
> does not verify anymore?
You're to blame
El 02/05/14 19:07, Don Armstrong escribió:
However, an interesting alternative possibility might be to just not
attach footers to messages which contain DKIM headers, as we already do
for messages which are signed.
If you do this, I would suggest that you put the Archive info in the
header in
El 02/05/14 19:07, Don Armstrong escribió:
Control: retitle -1 Do not append footers to messages with DKIM headers
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF
Control: retitle -1 Do not append footers to messages with DKIM headers
On Fri, 02 May 2014, Santiago Vila wrote:
> For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
> others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
> and at least Yahoo is actually rejecti
severity 500965 normal
thanks
For a lot of years this has not been a big problem, but now Yahoo and
others are using a policy called DMARC (built on top of DKIM and SPF)
and at least Yahoo is actually rejecting messages failing these kind
of digital signatures.
The following text comes from DMARC
8 matches
Mail list logo
