This one time, at band camp, Russell Coker said:
> On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards
> > would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based
> > on whether it's g
Hi Russell,
Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards
>> would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based
>> on whether it's going to be sent to
On Friday 03 October 2008 19:02, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course, even more preferable would be if people designing standards
> would not expect users to change the ways they sign messages (l=) based
> on whether it's going to be sent to a list or not as the only way to
> acc
severity important
thanks
Hi Russel,
thanks for alerting us of this problem.
Russell Coker wrote:
[ signatures in DKIM-Signature and DomainKey-Signature broken by
appending a footer]
For lists where the footer only contains unsubscription information, an
alternative to removing the headers co
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
Gmail sends out all mail signed with DKIM and DomainKeys, the DKIM
signatures do not include a length field so any change to the message
length (such as appending a list footer) will break the signature.
To deal with this problem the default configuratio
5 matches
Mail list logo
