On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:54:05PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:20:35PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Note that the list of regressions differ by architecture, but it
> > is probably not useful at this point to make a separate bug for
> > each of them, right?
> Ye
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 07:20:35PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Note that the list of regressions differ by architecture, but it
> is probably not useful at this point to make a separate bug for
> each of them, right?
>
Yes, they differ by architecture, because the list has been established
Note that the list of regressions differ by architecture, but it
is probably not useful at this point to make a separate bug for
each of them, right?
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
3 matches
Mail list logo