fixed 502497 1.5.19-1
thanks
Please upgrade to 1.5.19-1, the mbox(5) manpage now
correctly reports that the date format is asctime().
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 07:32:05PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2008-10-21 10:25:15, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>>> And where is the problem now?
>>>
>>> The date-time format described in "RFC2822 3.3"
>>> IS:
>>> Fri J
Am 2008-10-21 10:25:15, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > And where is the problem now?
> >
> > The date-time format described in "RFC2822 3.3"
> > IS:
> > Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
>
> I don't see how that matches the grammar pro
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:53:58PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> And where is the problem now?
>
> The date-time format described in "RFC2822 3.3"
> IS:
> Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
I don't see how that matches the grammar provided by RFC 2822 ยง3.3:
date-time = [ day-of-w
And where is the problem now?
The date-time format described in "RFC2822 3.3"
IS:
Fri Jun 23 02:56:55 2000
Am 2008-10-17 14:08:32, schrieb Trent W. Buck:
> Yet actually attempting to use this format results in mutt reporting
> an empty mailbox.
What do you mean, with: 'pty mailbox'?
I h
tags 502497 fixed-upstream upstream
thanks
Re: Trent W. Buck 2008-10-17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The good folk of Freenode's #mutt had this to say:
>
> fmg> the date in From_ is always asctime format
> fmg> debian man page is misleading you, take:
> http://www.qmail.org/qmail-manual-html/man5/m
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.18-4
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/man/man5/mbox.5.gz
The mbox(5) manpage says
The date [if the From_ line] is expected to be date-time as
defined in RFC2822 3.3.
Yet actually attempting to use this format results in mutt reporting
an empty mailbox. The ex
7 matches
Mail list logo