On Thursday 23 October 2008 23:49:52 Martin Meredith wrote:
The licencing of rar doesn't really allow for us to do this.
The licencing clearly states :-
5. The RAR/WinRAR unlicensed trial version may be freely distributed,
with exceptions noted below, provided the distribution
Indeed i have, however, i will not have time to do this until next
week, due to work. I apologise for the time delay, but will get right
on it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
b. The RAR/WinRAR unlicensed trial version may not be distributed
inside of any other software package without written
permission of the copyright owner.
Section 5.b
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: rar
Version: 1:3.8b3-1
Severity: wishlist
A 64 bit binary of rar was published on the rar site:
http://rarlab.com/rar/rarlinux-x64-3.8.0.tar.gz
please use it instead of the 32 bit static one for the amd64 port.
i've done some testing and there is a speedup dependent on the CPU type
On
The licencing of rar doesn't really allow for us to do this.
The licencing clearly states :-
5. The RAR/WinRAR unlicensed trial version may be freely distributed,
with exceptions noted below, provided the distribution package is
not modified in any way.
This means that we
On Thursday 23 October 2008 23:49:52 Martin Meredith wrote:
The licencing of rar doesn't really allow for us to do this.
The licencing clearly states :-
5. The RAR/WinRAR unlicensed trial version may be freely distributed,
with exceptions noted below, provided the distribution
6 matches
Mail list logo