On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:21:58 +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
Please don't play bug ping-pong and reopen bugs which are closed just
because you like to do so.
this isn't ping pong...i haven't touched the bug in over 8
months...that would be one crazy long game.
We have implemented the solution
Hi there!
Can you please keep the foo2zjs-maintainer mailing list cc:ed? If you
do so, no need to cc: me, I read the list. TIA.
I'm sorry for the long mail: I performed more tests with the only
foo2zjs printer I have [1] and I found some interesting stuff, please
read below. I tried to be as
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Luca Capello wrote:
FYI, the Release Team was asked for an advice on Sun, 26 October [2].
However, I know we (the Debian foo2zjs maintainers) decided to go to the
tech-ctte just two days later...
Indeed, hence the lack of comment. However, as this
reassign 503814 foo2zjs
forcemerge 449497 503814
thanks
There's no reason to have a separate bug report here assigned to the
technical committee; re-merging the bugs. If this needs to be reconsidered
by the TC, please reassign the bugs as a whole to both foo2zjs and the
tech-ctte virtual package
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 03:52:31PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the
maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release team
yet. So the current state of the bug isn't serious, but important.
ie, the views (on serious
Hi Michael!
Adding the d-release mailing list to cc:.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:41:25 +0100, Michael Gilbert wrote:
i'll go ahead and start the discussion since no one else is running
with it. this matter is rather urgent since the problem is now being
considered release-critical for lenny.
* Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081028 10:08]:
reassign -2 tech-ctte
Bug#503814: foo2zjs: getweb script depends on non-free firmware
Bug reassigned from package `foo2zjs' to `tech-ctte'.
As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose
the following
On Fri, Oct 31 2008, Andreas Barth wrote:
As this bug didn't get a decision from the release team yet, I'd propose
the following decision by the tech ctte:
1. Currently, the submitter claims that the bug is serious, the
maintainer don't think so, and there is no decision by the release team
8 matches
Mail list logo
