tag 442805 - wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 02:40:48AM +1100, Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> Many of the complaints about Debian's handling of documentation came
> from IRC, where recommendations of "perldoc -f whatever" were often
> met with a response from the querent of "perdoc not found". Th
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan meant:
> "apt-get install perl" should install perl-doc because the user is
> interested in perl but "apt-get install dpkg-dev" which does also depend
> on perl should not install perl-doc because perl-doc is not r
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Brendan O'Dea wrote:
> [snip]
> > So you may be able to downgrade the recommendation to a suggests,
> > although a better suggestion might be for apt/dpkg to support a
> > "Soft-Recommends" which would be installed by default only when t
Hello.
Brendan O'Dea wrote:
[snip]
> So you may be able to downgrade the recommendation to a suggests,
> although a better suggestion might be for apt/dpkg to support a
> "Soft-Recommends" which would be installed by default only when the
> package was directly selected, rather than pulled in as a
[+#504042, debian-dpkg, deity]
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could use some backing with #504042 / #496770 (perl-doc gets pulled
> in by default).
>
> You tagged #442805 as wontfix with
>
>> There is a bit of history with the perl-doc package... The perl
5 matches
Mail list logo
