David Prévot wrote:
> Currently, we have:
> - , in preparation since today.
> - , in preparation since yesterday.
> - , %s days in preparation.
>
> I'd propose something like:
> - , %s days in preparation, last activity today.
> - , %s days in preparation, last activity yesterday.
> - , %s days in
David Prévot wrote:
> Actually I intended to keep the first form too (and use the second form
> if and only if the number of day in preparation is at least two and the
> number of day in activity is different):
>>> - , in preparation since today.
>>> - , in preparation since yesterday.
Oh, well, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 22/04/2011 04:42, Justin B Rye a écrit :
>> I'd propose something like:
>> - , %s days in preparation, last activity today.
>> - , %s days in preparation, last activity yesterday.
>> - , %s days in preparation, last activity %s days ago.
>
> An
Hi,
Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 23:21:22, vous avez écrit :
> It would be nice to have the ability to sort the WNPP sub-pages by age.
> Possibly even additionally the "age since initiation" and "age since
> last activty".
We're talking about the http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/being_packaged page
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice to have the ability to sort the WNPP sub-pages by age.
Possibly even additionally the "age since initiation" and "age since
last activty".
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'tes
5 matches
Mail list logo
