Bug#506652: Yet another boilerplate change

2008-11-30 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ben Hutchings: > Maybe you should ask for xml2rfc to be removed from testing and then > upload it to volatile instead? I'm not clear on what the rules for > volatile are. Something like that is the plan, yes. In any case, I don't want to have the current version in lenny, hence the RC severit

Bug#506652: Yet another boilerplate change

2008-11-28 Thread Ben Hutchings
Florian, Maybe you should ask for xml2rfc to be removed from testing and then upload it to volatile instead? I'm not clear on what the rules for volatile are. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Any smoothly functioning technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo. signature.asc Description: This is

Bug#506652: Yet another boilerplate change

2008-11-23 Thread Florian Weimer
Package: xml2rfc Severity: grave Version: 1.33.dfsg-2 This means we shouldn't release the current xml2rfc version with lenny. From: "Ed Juskevicius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Announcement: New Boilerplate Text Required for all new Submissions to IETF To: "IETF Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTE