On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:46:29PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> To be picky, the link behind 5.0.32-7etch6 actually leads to a page
> describing -etch8. While 5.0.32-7etch8 has no link. That seems
> illogical.
That's caused by the fact that packages.d.o maintains no
(user-visible) concept of a
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 01:02:48PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
>> I see two strange things on this page:
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0.html
>
> Thanks for this bug report!
>
>> 1. it lists 5.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 01:02:48PM +0100, Daniel Bonniot wrote:
> and on http://packages.debian.org/source/stable/mysql-dfsg-5.0
> There it is rightly etch8, but the link to the changelog is dead:
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0/mysql-dfsg-5.0_5.0.32-7etch8/change
Package: qa.debian.org
Hi,
I see two strange things on this page:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mysql-dfsg-5.0.html
1. it lists 5.0.32-7etch6 as the current stable and stable-security
version, while it has been -etch8 for more than 20 days
2. in the latest news section, etch8 does not appear.
4 matches
Mail list logo