Bug#507942: ecryptfs-utils: Missing upstream change information

2008-12-16 Thread Daniel Baumann
Dustin Kirkland wrote: > Shall I do a git log dump between releases, and package that in the > release tarball? it looks kind of ugly for a 'normal' changelog with all the hashes etc, but i've not yet digged up the right --pretty=format:$whatever option to have it formated in the gnu style. in the

Bug#507942: ecryptfs-utils: Missing upstream change information

2008-12-16 Thread Dustin Kirkland
Daniel wrote > Osamu Aoki wrote: > > Since there is no upstream changelog included (not even URL pointer) it > > is quite difficult to find what does it mean by > > upstream changelog is the obligation of upstream, I'm sure Dustin will > include it in the future. Shall I do a git log dump betwee

Bug#507942: ecryptfs-utils: Missing upstream change information

2008-12-14 Thread Daniel Baumann
tags 507942 +upstream thanks Osamu Aoki wrote: > Since there is no upstream changelog included (not even URL pointer) it > is quite difficult to find what does it mean by upstream changelog is the obligation of upstream, I'm sure Dustin will include it in the future. > This package seem to use

Bug#507942: ecryptfs-utils: Missing upstream change information

2008-12-05 Thread Osamu Aoki
Package: ecryptfs-utils Version: 67-1 Severity: minor I was wondering why mouning operation causing message such as no "rw" option etc... Since there is no upstream changelog included (not even URL pointer) it is quite difficult to find what does it mean by | ecryptfs-utils (67-1) unstable; urg