Package: general
Followup-For: Bug #508644
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
*
Hi,
h01ger http://paste.debian.net/90185/ - thats on a squeeze system - any
ideas?
h01ger bitten by my own bug: #508644
h01ger and ssmtp misses a provides: default-mta - is that serious,
important, wishlist?
the log mentioned above is this:
r...@sun:~# dpkg -l ssmtp
On Freitag, 17. September 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
h01ger and ssmtp misses a provides: default-mta - is that serious,
important, wishlist?
I'm filing an important bug on ssmtp now.
aehm, no.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Samstag, 19. Dezember 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, exim4-daemon-light now Provides: default-mta and a number of packages
depend on it already.
So let's file bugs on all packages depending on mail-transfer-agent instead
Hi,
On Samstag, 19. Dezember 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
Yes, exim4-daemon-light now Provides: default-mta and a number of packages
depend on it already.
So let's file bugs on all packages depending on mail-transfer-agent instead
of default-mta | mail-transfer-agent? (And make those bugs
Hi,
what is the status of this now? Should packages depend on default-mta
instead of exim4 or not yet?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:56:25PM +0900, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
what is the status of this now? Should packages depend on default-mta
instead of exim4 or not yet?
Yes, exim4-daemon-light now Provides: default-mta and a number of packages
depend on it already.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek
7 matches
Mail list logo
