David Baron wrote:
And? Then tell the package systen using (equivs?) that you have Java
already. The package system in this case does not know that - it simply
cant.
OK, how? As I say below, JAVA_HOME is usually in the env.
I said it. equivs.
I have not encountered others that would not
unmerge 509690
retitle 509690 make Java dependencies more generic (java?-runtime, jre)
tag 509690 - moreinfo
tag 509690 - wontfix
block 509690 by 495876
thanks
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
I have not encountered others that would not install. OO-3 that I have
currently installed from
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 1:3.0.1-rc2
Severity: important
I have a sun-java-jre installed from Sun's runtime.
I can no longer update openoffice packages because they seem to demand Debians
sun-java packages.
OpenOffice's java component runs off the Sun installation just fine as does
most
retitle 509690 please don't depend on Java
severity 509690 wishlist
tag 509690 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
David Baron wrote:
I have a sun-java-jre installed from Sun's runtime.
I can no longer update openoffice packages because they seem to demand
Debians sun-java packages.
Wrong. It demands
Rene Engelhard wrote:
OpenOffice's java component runs off the Sun installation just fine as does
most all other java
programs. I really do not need a duplicate installation.
And? Then tell the package systen using (equivs?) that you have Java already.
The package system in this case
Rene Engelhard wrote:
And break the install for people who don't know that parts use Java?
And thus don't install them?
And note that only parts who really do need Java depend on it - and the
openoffice.org metapackage which of course depends on those pieces.
E.g. the help-* packages only
On Thursday 25 December 2008 00:44:41 Rene Engelhard wrote:
retitle 509690 please don't depend on Java
severity 509690 wishlist
tag 509690 + wontfix
thanks
Hi,
David Baron wrote:
I have a sun-java-jre installed from Sun's runtime.
I can no longer update openoffice packages because they
7 matches
Mail list logo
