On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 22:52 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Sorry, I pasted wrong URL. What I intended is as follows.
>
> >> I google'd a bit and found that this seemed a well-known problem.
> >>
> >> For example, an info in
>
> http://documents.wolfram.com/mathematica/GettingStarted/SystemAdmin
Sorry, I pasted wrong URL. What I intended is as follows.
>> I google'd a bit and found that this seemed a well-known problem.
>>
>> For example, an info in
http://documents.wolfram.com/mathematica/GettingStarted/SystemAdministrationGuide/UnixLinuxAdministration/Fonts.html
>> doesn't help you?
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 21:48 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> I google'd a bit and found that this seemed a well-known problem.
>
> For example, an info in
>
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Font-FAQ#Does_OpenOffice.org_2_support_OpenType_fonts_named_with_.22.OTF.22_.28having_CFF_outlin
Hi Drew,
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:29:43 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> What I can say, however, is that I installed a test version of
> Mathematica 7 on my computer. It does *not* help the remote access
> problem (Mathematica 5.1) on the remote computer:
> $ mathematica
> xset: bad font path eleme
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:20 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:29:43 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > Since installing Mathematica 7 does not fix the problem, I assume that
> > MathematicaPlayer does not fix it either. That means your font package
>
> Okay, I see.
>
> > I susp
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:29:43 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Since installing Mathematica 7 does not fix the problem, I assume that
> MathematicaPlayer does not fix it either. That means your font package
Okay, I see.
> I suspect ttf is sufficient, but I don't know for sure.
> I'm happy to test any
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 08:20 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:19:37 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > It's importance for me is that we have access to Mathematica installed on
> > the central university computer. When I run it from a terminal on my
> > computer, M
Hi all,
The WRI put the fonts again in their web site so I just
uploaded a new package which should download the Mathematica
fonts.
But I also uploaded a STIX fonts package to experimental
and I'm not sure if ttf-mathematica4.1 is necessary for
Debian from now on.
I'd like to hear any advise
Hi Drew,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:19:37 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> It's importance for me is that we have access to Mathematica installed on
> the central university computer. When I run it from a terminal on my
> computer, Mathematica complains about fonts not being available. So
> this is an
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 11:12 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:19:37 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> > While it's good to see that MathML support is improved (such that we
> > don't need these fonts for that purpose), I'd like to heartily give my
> > support for kee
Hi Drew,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:19:37 +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> While it's good to see that MathML support is improved (such that we
> don't need these fonts for that purpose), I'd like to heartily give my
> support for keeping this font package in working order!
Thanks, but it depends heavil
Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> I believe ttf-mathematica4.1 is no more necessary to render
> MathML with iceweasel >= 3.0
>
> I'll fix the problem with my package and try the next
> attempts.
Thanks for maintaining access to the Mathematica fonts, Atsuhito.
While it's good to see that MathML support
12 matches
Mail list logo
