2009/1/28 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
I'd like to thank everyone who replied on these bugs over the last
couple years. Especially the people who prodded me into trying out
kernel 2.6.18-6. I've tracked down the bug, or at least I think maybe
I have. There is definitely a bug here,
suggest that the blocking is not visible when using the 2.6.26 kernel,=
while you said that it is.
=20
Only two reports? I really doubt it (search for older bugs!). At least =
it
worked for me with a more recent kernel whereas it freezed using 2.6.28=
=2E
Did you really mean 2.6.28 (which is
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
suggest that the blocking is not visible when using the 2.6.26 kernel,=
while you said that it is.
Only two reports? I really doubt it (search for older bugs!). At least it
worked for me with a more recent kernel whereas it
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
snip
microwaverich, could you test once more, just to be sure, that under
each one of these setups aptitude blocks:
1) etch kernel (2.6.18-6-k7 - if you no longer have it, you can grab
it from http://packages.debian.org/etch/linux-image-2.6.18-6-k7)
official aptitude
2009/1/27 Rich Griffiths richg...@one.net:
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
snip
microwaverich, could you test once more, just to be sure, that under
each one of these setups aptitude blocks:
1) etch kernel (2.6.18-6-k7 - if you no longer have it, you can grab
it from
This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug.
Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's
produced in /tmp/cwidget.input.log when you reproduce the bug? If I
start aptitude, run dpkg once, and exit, I get this:
Starting input thread
Creating new input thread
Input
reassign 479438 cwidget
forcemerge 479438 348481 431054 431688 432323 434861 462923 466254 475368
thanks
2009/1/27 Jens Seidel jenssei...@users.sf.net:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 01:31:34PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
suggest that the blocking is not visible when using the 2.6.26 kernel,=
2009/1/27 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug.
Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's
produced in /tmp/cwidget.input.log when you reproduce the bug? If I
start aptitude, run dpkg once, and exit, I get this:
I
2009/1/27 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug.
Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's
produced in /tmp/cwidget.input.log when you reproduce the bug? If I
start aptitude, run dpkg once, and exit, I get this:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:12:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
reassign 479438 cwidget
forcemerge 479438 348481 431054 431688 432323 434861 462923 466254 475368
thanks
Thanks for the triage.
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:46:22PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
2009/1/27 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug.
Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's
produced in
I'd like to thank everyone who replied on these bugs over the last
couple years. Especially the people who prodded me into trying out
kernel 2.6.18-6. I've tracked down the bug, or at least I think maybe
I have. There is definitely a bug here, but it seems to be failing
even in cases where it
(microwavwrich, please see somewhere below some paragraphs addressed
to you. Thanks in advance.)
2009/1/21 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:45:37PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
I think I have found a lead after reading a comment
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:04:17PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote:
There are 2 reports (1 from myself and another from somebody else) who
suggest that the blocking is not visible when using the 2.6.26 kernel,
while you said that it is.
Only two reports? I really doubt it (search for older bugs!).
retitle 511708 aptitude: TUI blocks after doing one set of operations
(only with etch kernel)
thanks
2009/1/19 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 05:28:27PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
found 511708 0.4.11-2
thanks
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:45:37PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
I think I have found a lead after reading a comment from another user:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504063#17
I installed lenny's kernel and with this kernel the bug is
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 05:28:27PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
Package: aptitude
found 511708 0.4.11-2
thanks
2009/1/17 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org:
Once we have a tighter range of versions, it might be worth trying
bisect out, but it'll be
I just had a realization. We don't need to mess around with bisect
and recompiling; you can just grab old versions from
snapshot.debian.net and see whether the bug shows up in them.
Once we have a tighter range of versions, it might be worth trying
bisect out, but it'll be easier too.
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch
and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks
after any set of operations that is done with dpkg.
Daniel Burrows a scris:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch
and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks
after any set of operations
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:23:55AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
Daniel Burrows a scris:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor
eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say:
I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 08:47:34PM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org
was heard to say:
Something that would be even better if you can manage it would be to
use hg bisect. This will be time-consuming, but has the potential to
track down exactly what's happening, or at least what
Package: aptitude
Severity: serious
Justification: No more than one operation, looses information, blocks
the console, regression
Version: 0.4.11.11-1~lenny1
Hello,
I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch
and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI
23 matches
Mail list logo
